Morality Without God? #2020

Morality Without God? By Walter Sinnott-Armstrong Morality Without God Some argue that atheism must be false since without God no values are possible and thus everything is permitted Walter Sinnott Armstrong argues that God is not only not essential to morality but t
  • Title: Morality Without God?
  • Author: Walter Sinnott-Armstrong
  • ISBN: 9780195337631
  • Page: 198
  • Format: Hardcover
  • Morality Without God? By Walter Sinnott-Armstrong
    Morality Without God? By Walter Sinnott-Armstrong Some argue that atheism must be false, since without God, no values are possible, and thus everything is permitted Walter Sinnott Armstrong argues that God is not only not essential to morality, but that our moral behavior should be utterly independent of religion He attacks several core ideas that atheists are inherently immoral people that any society will sink intSome argue that atheism must be false, since without God, no values are possible, and thus everything is permitted Walter Sinnott Armstrong argues that God is not only not essential to morality, but that our moral behavior should be utterly independent of religion He attacks several core ideas that atheists are inherently immoral people that any society will sink into chaos if it is becomes too secular that without religion, we have no reason to be moral that absolute moral standards require the existence of God and that without religion, we simply couldn t know what is wrong and what is right.Sinnott Armstrong brings to bear convincing examples and data, as well as a lucid, elegant, and easy to understand writing style This book should fit well with the debates raging over issues like evolution and intelligent design, atheism, and religion and public life as an example of a pithy, tightly constructed argument on an issue of great social importance In his call for sincere dialogue with theists, Sinnott Armstrong provides a welcome relief from the apoplectic excesses of Richard Dawkins and Christopher Hitchens, while also addressing objections to homosexuality and evolution frequently raised by evangelical Christians Publishers Weekly I t is accessible and lively, my hope is that it will be widely read, especially by theists Peter Lamal, The Humanist the clarity of this text successfully defuses many erroneous claims about religion and morality, both popular and academic this volume certainly deserves a wide audience in this increasingly secular and skeptical world Choice Morality Without God is an engaging, pithy book arguing against the necessity of God and religion for a robust morality Walter Sinnott Armstrong has distinguished himself as a leading philosopher in his work on metaethics and moral psychology, as well as books on moral and epistemological skepticism, and in Morality Without God he commendably succeeds in writing a philosophically respectable introduction to the problems facing religious morality suitable for virtually any audience Philosophia Christi
    • [PDF] ✓ Unlimited ✓ Morality Without God? : by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong À
      198 Walter Sinnott-Armstrong
    • thumbnail Title: [PDF] ✓ Unlimited ✓ Morality Without God? : by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong À
      Posted by:Walter Sinnott-Armstrong
      Published :2020-04-17T14:43:40+00:00

    About “Walter Sinnott-Armstrong

    • Walter Sinnott-Armstrong

      Walter Sinnott-Armstrong Is a well-known author, some of his books are a fascination for readers like in the Morality Without God? book, this is one of the most wanted Walter Sinnott-Armstrong author readers around the world.

    586 thoughts on “Morality Without God?

    • Walter Sinnot Armstrong argues in this book that the basis of morality can be found without god, as the subtitle states In addition to this he argues for why morality based on god, in particular the Christian god, can not form a basis for morality His basis for morality without god involves the concept of harm Those who harm another, or fails to prevent a harm when possible, commits a moral wrong After he sets the stage, he presents that there is no factual evidence that atheists or secular soci [...]


    • Sek ler ahlak teorisini e itli arg manlarla a klamaya al an uzun bir makaleden olu uyor kitap Temellendirmeleri daha sa lam olabilirdi.


    • Kitap teist ahlak ele tiriyor ve ateist ahlak anlay n form lize ediyor Tabi ki bunu kendi bak a s yla yap yor nk yazara g re teistlerin aksine ateistler neyin do ru neyin yanl oldu unu s yleyen bir st otoriteye tabi de iller Temelde teist ahlak n kutsal emir teorisi temeline dayand n buna kar l k ateist ahlak n ise zarar teorisi temeline dayand n s yl yor Ayr ca ahlak n herkesin i inde bulundu u b ylece evrensel bir ahlak anlay n n var oldu unu s yl yor Bunun da temeli ba kas na ac vermemekten g [...]


    • I wanted to read this book after seeing a review that indicated that Sinnott Armstrong attempts to establish an objective basis for morality in this book, but I was rather disappointed in his efforts in this direction.Now, I should say that Sinnott Armstrong s main goals in the book are to show that it is possible for atheists, agnostics, and secularists to justify their moral beliefs apart from appeals to God and religious texts and to show the problems with religiously based ethical systems pa [...]


    • This is a good, short book arguing that God and religion are not necessary for morality Sinnott Armstrong spends a chapter each arguing 1 that atheists are not inherently any worse than theists, 2 that a society of non believers will not devolve into corruption and immorality here he analyzes various studies which show correlations between atheism theism and immoral behaviors , 3 a secular morality can be based on the harm principle, 4 traditional Divine Command Theory is problematic as a standa [...]


    • One of my favorite books on the subject of God and morality It is one of those controversial subjects and taboos in society since many people believe that religion particularly Christianity is the source, and foundation, of morality Armstrong shows that this is not the case since morality can indeed be independent of all the religions and showed why the conservative religious account of morality is problematic While it can be disputed as to whether Armstrong successfully demonstrated that morali [...]


    • It was a short book but a slow read I don t know if it s because he was preaching to the choir or if I thought his writing style was slow the Bible cannot provide a solid foundation for morality or for knowledge of morality This is what I m wrestling with right now I have argued for a long time that the Bible is not a book to give us a list of moral rules In fact, though I believe in God, I would agree with the author s harm based morality Reading this book makes you realize how arbitrary people [...]


    • Concilatory in its intentions, this book argues that the existence of God, belief in God, divine revelation, or a divine lawgiver are not necessary for morality, and that atheists, agnostics, free thinkers, and members of non Abrahamic faiths can be just as moral as Christians He offers a harm based morality as one alternative, and points out the weaknesses in God based morality One particular statement he shows false is If God is dead, everything is permitted His objective is to make atheists l [...]


    • An engaging read, but Sinnott Armstrong s harm based morality is not an objective morality in any tangible way That means it is not really useful for the sorts of things people use traditional moral systems for If he had qualified it in that way, I would have been interested.I was interested by Sinnott Armstrong s desire that atheists and theists be better friends, but I found that he couldn t resist taking shots even cheap shots at Christianity throughout All in all, he is very assured of his [...]


    • I read this on the recommendation to a friend not of a friend someone else suggested it to this friend to explore how morality can stand without God Sinnott Armstrong is a philosopher A professional one who teaches at a university and everything So the fact that his characterizations of theistic positions regarding morality and really poor arguments were just disappointing as can be.


    • This seemed fuzzy Not clear, a little wishy washy, no real stand I do believe it s good to listen to others thoughts with an open mind, but not to the point that your own thoughts end up a fuzzy, foggy mess.



    • This was a good book, and his argument was solid I just wish I cared about the argument and less about my mortgage these days A few years ago, I would ve eaten this bad boy up.


    • Millions of atheists and agnostics live good lives without doing harm to other people.but theists do not seem to understand how this can be possible So they should read this book.



    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *